SAFETY & THE ENVIRONMENT

We recognize there is much debate regarding the perceived health risks with turf, we are looking for balance in our recommendations to address all concerns. We will be building up our FAQ & Resource sections in the coming days and weeks.

Health & Safety Statements

The most common studies cited relating to health risks with turf fields reference chemicals and materials used in traditional rubber crumb infill, turf technology has significantly evolved in recent years, including the option of silica sand infill.
There are also studies regarding the use of pesticides to properly maintain grass fields which can have a negative health impact.
There are an equal number of studies balancing out the rate of injuries on turf vs. grass, but the majority agree that degree and frequency of head injuries is far less on turf with a concussion pad than on grass fields.
Tryout, preseason, practices and away games are played on turf – in season, practices, and home games are the only time our athletes compete on grass.
The only way to avoid health risks and protect our athletes is to choose the newest, safest turf available.
Recognizing these concerns, the School Committee’s Sustainability Policy (pending approval in April) will inform decisions relative to material selection for turf fields on Masconomet’s campus.

We can choose the materials used that pose less of a risk to our students and our environment. We can have “safe” turf at Masconomet Regional High School.

Design, Engineering, Permitting Process + Environmental Concerns

Stantec is committed to understanding the full extent of Boxford Conservation Commission’s permitting requirements, concerns and expectations as it relates to location of the Turf Fields

Survey – Schematic Design Package
Wetlands and waterbodies delineation
Geotechnical Investigations & Opinions of Probable Project Costs
Drainage Analysis & Stormwater Report
Synthetic Turf System Review & Selection
Permitting
- TV Inspections / Utility Explorations
- Site Plan Review & Meetings, Planning Staff
- Conservation Commission, Notice of Intent Filing & Public Hearings
- Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
- Bidding Phase Services

Task 2.3 Synthetic Turf System Review and Selection (as pulled from Stantec’s Synthetic Turf Proposal)

In conjunction with a Design Review Meeting, Stantec will also familiarize the School with the myriad of available infilled synthetic turf systems, alternative infill materials, and specialty athletic surfacing vendors. Based upon the Schools responses to the following (and other) questions, Stantec will prepare a performance based technical specification for the infilled synthetic turf system:

• Does the School already have a preferred system?

• What sports will be considered for the fields?

• What type of infill is preferred?

• We will present recent testing on SBR rubber and Green Certification available

• What type of synthetic fiber is preferred?

• Resilient underlayment (padding). This will tie into infill ratio and safety level.

• Will there be any logos or other graphics installed in the field?

• Will the synthetic turf system be bid separately or will it fall under the general construction scope?

• In either case, what construction responsibilities will be under the synthetic turf installer’s scope?

[Stantec] will be prepared to discuss the pros and cons of these as well as other questions to ensure that the School receives competitive bids for high quality products from reputable and experienced manufacturers. Please note, Stantec’s Sport Group is a Certified Independent Consultant by the Synthetic Turf Council (STC).